How to Calculate Pain and Suffering in a Chicago Personal Injury Lawsuit

by Injury Law Support | Oct 30, 2024

In a personal injury lawsuit, one of the most challenging aspects is determining fair compensation for pain and suffering. Unlike tangible costs like medical bills or lost wages, pain and suffering are intangible, making them more difficult to quantify. If you’ve been injured in Chicago, understanding how pain and suffering are calculated in a legal context can provide valuable insight as you consider filing a claim. From physical pain and emotional distress to impacts on your daily life, many factors contribute to these damages.

In this article, we’ll explore how attorneys and courts approach calculating pain and suffering in Chicago, giving you a clearer picture of what you may be entitled to receive as part of a personal injury settlement.

What Is The Definition of Pain & Suffering in a Lawsuit in Illinois?
What Types of Injuries Qualify For Pain & Suffering Financial Compensation?
What Types of Evidence Prove Pain & Suffering?
What Is The Formula Used To Calculate Pain & Suffering Financial Compensation?
What Is The Multiplier Method?
What Is The Per Diem Method?
What Is The Typical Amount of Compensation Recovered For Pain & Suffering?
Does Insurance Pay For a Pain & Suffering Claim?
Is Future Pain and Suffering Included in the Payout Calculation?
When Might Pain and Suffering Compensation Not Be Available in Illinois?
Can Financial Compensation For Pain & Suffering By Capped by Illinois Law?
Who Can Help Me With a Lawsuit?

What Is The Definition of Pain & Suffering in a Lawsuit in Illinois?

In Illinois, “pain and suffering” refers to the physical and emotional hardships that a person endures due to an injury caused by someone else’s negligence. It goes beyond direct expenses like medical bills and lost wages, focusing instead on the personal toll an injury can take. This can include physical discomfort, chronic pain, and limitations on one’s ability to enjoy life fully, as well as emotional effects like anxiety, stress, and loss of companionship or enjoyment.

In a lawsuit, pain and suffering fall under non-economic damages, meaning they don’t have a fixed monetary value. Illinois courts recognize that these personal experiences significantly impact an individual’s quality of life, and as such, they allow plaintiffs to seek compensation that accounts for both present and future suffering. However, it’s essential to present compelling evidence—such as medical records, personal journals, or expert testimony—to demonstrate the extent of this impact in court. By understanding the definition of pain and suffering in Illinois, you’re better equipped to navigate the process of seeking fair compensation for the often invisible yet real damages you’ve suffered.

Have some questions?
We can help you find answers.

What Types of Injuries Qualify For Pain & Suffering Financial Compensation?

In a damages lawsuit, certain types of injuries can warrant compensation for pain and suffering in addition to economic losses like medical bills or lost income. In general, injuries that significantly impact a person’s quality of life or require ongoing medical attention are likely to qualify for this type of financial compensation.

Physical Pain and Disabilities: Injuries resulting in chronic pain, physical disabilities, or long-term discomfort often qualify for pain and suffering compensation. This includes injuries like broken bones, severe burns, spinal cord injuries, or nerve damage—conditions that cause daily pain or restrict movement, impacting routine activities and overall well-being.
Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBIs): Traumatic brain injuries can result in cognitive impairments, memory loss, and even personality changes, making them eligible for pain and suffering claims. These injuries often alter a person’s mental capabilities and can have profound effects on personal relationships and emotional health.
Emotional and Psychological Distress: While physical injuries are commonly linked to pain and suffering, emotional injuries can qualify as well. Anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and other psychological impacts stemming from an accident are recognized as genuine forms of suffering that may deserve compensation.
Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Injuries that restrict someone from participating in activities they once enjoyed, such as sports, hobbies, or social gatherings, may also qualify. Courts recognize that losing the ability to live life fully, especially after a traumatic event, is a significant hardship deserving of compensation.
Scarring and Disfigurement: Permanent scarring or disfigurement can lead to emotional pain and social consequences, making these types of injuries eligible for pain and suffering damages. Scarring, particularly when visible or altering one’s appearance, can affect self-esteem and result in social anxiety, which the law considers when awarding compensation.

In these cases, pain and suffering damages aim to compensate for both the physical and emotional toll of an injury, beyond what can be documented with receipts or pay stubs. Proving these damages often requires medical records, expert testimonies, and sometimes even personal journals to illustrate the ongoing impact of the injury.

What Types of Evidence Prove Pain & Suffering?

Proving pain and suffering in a personal injury case can be challenging, as it requires showing the impact of an injury beyond physical wounds or medical bills. Since pain and suffering involve both physical and emotional hardships, a variety of evidence can be used to demonstrate its effect on a person’s quality of life. Following are some important types of evidence that are commonly used to support a claim for pain and suffering:

Medical Records: Medical records are one of the strongest forms of evidence for proving pain and suffering. Detailed records from doctors, therapists, and other healthcare providers document the nature and severity of an injury, the treatments received, and any notes on a patient’s discomfort or limitations. These records establish a clear link between the injury and ongoing pain or emotional distress.
Expert Testimony: Testimony from medical experts or mental health professionals can provide an authoritative perspective on the extent of pain and suffering an injury has caused. These professionals can describe how the injury likely affects the individual’s daily life and future health, which can lend credibility to the claims of emotional or physical distress.
Personal Journal or Pain Diary: Some plaintiffs keep a journal or “pain diary” where they record daily experiences, pain levels, limitations, and emotional states. This diary provides a firsthand account of the day-to-day impact of the injury, showing how physical pain or emotional struggles affect various areas of life. While it’s personal, it serves as a powerful tool to illustrate the ongoing nature of pain and suffering.
Photographic Evidence: Photographs showing visible injuries, scars, or disabilities can be effective in demonstrating pain and suffering. Photos taken immediately after the injury, during treatment, and in recovery can document the physical impact over time, which can support claims of prolonged suffering.
Testimony from Family and Friends: Statements from family members, friends, or colleagues can help paint a picture of how the injury has changed the plaintiff’s life. Those close to the injured party can describe any noticeable changes in mood, mobility, and activity levels, reinforcing claims of pain and suffering in ways that professional reports may not capture.
Employment Records: If an injury impacts someone’s ability to work, employment records showing missed workdays, reduced hours, or lower performance due to pain can also support pain and suffering claims. Such records help illustrate how the injury disrupts daily functioning, which can be crucial in a pain and suffering assessment.

Each of these types of evidence contributes to building a comprehensive view of the pain and suffering an injured person endures. Combining these forms of evidence helps strengthen a case, showing the court the full extent of both physical and emotional damages that go beyond what is immediately visible or financially quantifiable.

Click to contact Injury Law Support.

What Is The Formula Used To Calculate Pain & Suffering Financial Compensation in Illinois?

Calculating financial compensation for pain and suffering in Illinois can be complex because there’s no universally fixed formula. Unlike economic damages, which are based on tangible losses like medical bills or lost wages, pain and suffering involve subjective factors, making it challenging to assign a precise dollar amount. However, two main methods are often used to estimate fair compensation for these types of damages: the Multiplier Method and the Per Diem Method.

Courts in Illinois don’t mandate one method over the other, allowing flexibility in calculating pain and suffering. The chosen approach depends largely on the case’s specifics, with both attorneys and judges considering factors like injury severity, medical documentation, and expert testimony to determine what constitutes fair compensation. In the end, the goal is to reach a figure that reasonably reflects the impact of the injury on a person’s life, providing just compensation for the physical pain and emotional hardship endured.

What Is The Multiplier Method?

The Multiplier Method is a widely used approach in personal injury cases to calculate pain and suffering compensation. It’s designed to assign a dollar value to the non-economic damages an individual experiences after an injury. Unlike medical bills or lost income, which can be precisely documented, pain and suffering are subjective experiences, making them harder to quantify. The Multiplier Method helps bridge that gap by providing a structured way to estimate compensation based on the impact of an injury.

How the Multiplier Method Works

With the Multiplier Method, the total of economic damages—such as medical expenses, therapy costs, and lost wages—is multiplied by a number, or “multiplier,” typically ranging from 1.5 to 5. This multiplier reflects the severity and impact of the injury on the individual’s life. Here’s a quick breakdown of how multipliers are often chosen:

Minor Injuries (Multiplier of 1.5 to 2): These may include injuries that heal relatively quickly, like minor fractures or strains. Since the long-term impact is minimal, the multiplier is kept low.
Moderate Injuries (Multiplier of 2 to 3): Injuries requiring extended medical treatment, physical therapy, or that result in more significant discomfort and lifestyle disruption typically fall in this range.
Severe Injuries (Multiplier of 3 to 5): Serious injuries like spinal damage, head trauma, or those causing long-term disability are assigned a higher multiplier because of the lasting physical, emotional, and psychological impact.For example, if an individual incurs $30,000 in economic damages due to a car accident and their injuries are severe enough to warrant a multiplier of 4, the calculation for pain and suffering would be $30,000 x 4, totaling $120,000 in non-economic compensation.

Choosing the Right Multiplier

Determining the appropriate multiplier is crucial and often involves several factors:

Severity and Duration of the Injury: More severe or long-lasting injuries tend to have higher multipliers. Injuries causing chronic pain or lifelong limitations will generally justify a higher multiplier than those with shorter recovery periods.

Impact on Daily Life: If an injury limits someone’s ability to work, socialize, or perform everyday tasks, this is often grounds for a higher multiplier. The law recognizes that losing one’s quality of life or independence warrants greater compensation.

Degree of Negligence: Sometimes, the actions of the person at fault can influence the multiplier. Cases involving reckless or intentional behavior may result in a higher multiplier, reflecting the seriousness of the negligent actions.

Emotional and Psychological Effects: Emotional trauma, such as anxiety, depression, or PTSD caused by the accident, can also contribute to a higher multiplier, as it indicates the injury’s broader impact on the victim’s mental health.

Why the Multiplier Method is Used

The Multiplier Method is commonly chosen because it’s both straightforward and flexible, accommodating the unique aspects of each case. This approach helps courts and insurance companies standardize compensation, creating a baseline that can be adjusted based on the individual’s specific circumstances. In Illinois, as in many states, the method is a valuable tool in valuing pain and suffering, ensuring that victims receive a fair amount based on the hardships they’ve endured.

Ultimately, while the Multiplier Method doesn’t erase the pain or restore what was lost, it provides a fair financial estimate for the suffering endured, helping injured parties move forward with the support they need.

Questions about pain and suffering damages?

What Is The Per Diem Method?

The Per Diem Method is another common approach for calculating pain and suffering compensation in personal injury cases. Meaning “per day” in Latin, the Per Diem Method involves assigning a daily monetary value to the victim’s pain and suffering, which is then multiplied by the number of days the individual has experienced discomfort due to the injury. This method aims to capture the day-to-day impact of pain, loss, and inconvenience that an injury inflicts on someone’s life, ultimately leading to a total compensation amount that feels fair and justified.

How the Per Diem Method Works

The Per Diem Method calculates pain and suffering based on a daily rate, often tied to the injured person’s average daily earnings. For example, if someone earns $200 a day, that amount may be used as the “per diem” rate for their pain and suffering calculation. The rate is then multiplied by the number of days the person has been impacted by the injury. This timeframe can range from the date of the injury until full recovery or the day the case reaches settlement, depending on the specifics of the injury.

For instance, if an individual was injured in an accident and the recovery period lasted 120 days, with a daily rate set at $200, the calculation would be: 120 days × 200 dollars per day = 24,000 dollars

This $24,000 would represent the pain and suffering compensation.

Determining the Daily Rate

The daily rate isn’t strictly defined by law and may vary based on the circumstances of each case. Some commonly considered factors include:

Wages and Salary: Often, an individual’s daily wage is used as a fair and quantifiable figure, especially if the injury affects their ability to work. Using this approach, the court assumes that the discomfort of pain and suffering is comparable to the effort of a workday.

Severity of Pain and Limitations: For severe injuries causing daily pain or emotional distress, a higher daily rate might be assigned. This adjustment accounts for the extraordinary toll taken on a person’s mental and physical well-being, beyond the monetary measure of their income.

Emotional or Psychological Impacts: In some cases, emotional suffering, such as anxiety, depression, or PTSD, may justify a higher daily rate. For instance, if a traumatic event significantly disrupts an individual’s life, courts may assign an elevated rate to capture the full scope of pain and suffering.

Situations Where the Per Diem Method is Useful

The Per Diem Method is especially practical for injuries with a clear start and end date—when the victim’s suffering has a specific, finite recovery period. This could include broken bones, surgeries with full recoveries, or other short- to medium-term injuries. However, in cases where injuries are long-term, ongoing, or chronic, the Per Diem Method may be less effective, as it’s difficult to predict when or if the suffering will end. For these types of cases, other methods like the Multiplier Method are typically preferred.

Benefits and Limitations of the Per Diem Method

One of the key benefits of the Per Diem Method is that it personalizes the compensation, tying it directly to the daily impact of the injury on the individual’s life. However, it does have its limitations. Assigning a daily rate can sometimes be seen as arbitrary, especially if the rate doesn’t adequately reflect the physical or emotional toll of the injury. Additionally, defendants and insurers may challenge the Per Diem Method, arguing that the daily rate is excessive or the timeframe unrealistic.

Despite these challenges, the Per Diem Method remains a valuable tool for attorneys and courts to estimate pain and suffering in a straightforward, logical way. By focusing on the daily impact, it allows injured individuals to seek compensation that reflects the personal, day-to-day hardship of their recovery journey.

Need help reviewing a claim? Contact us today.

What Is The Typical Amount of Compensation Recovered For Pain & Suffering in Illinois?

While there is no “standard” payout for pain and suffering in Illinois, settlements often fall within certain ranges, depending on the nature and severity of the injury:

Minor Injuries: For less severe injuries—such as minor fractures, soft tissue damage, or temporary injuries that heal relatively quickly—pain and suffering compensation might range from a few thousand to tens of thousands of dollars. These cases generally involve a lower multiplier or daily rate, reflecting the relatively short-term impact on the victim’s life.
Moderate to Serious Injuries: In cases where injuries are moderate to severe, requiring extended recovery, physical therapy, or ongoing medical treatment, compensation amounts are typically higher. These cases may see pain and suffering awards ranging from $50,000 to $200,000 or more, depending on the duration of recovery and the extent of lifestyle impact.
Catastrophic Injuries: For life-altering injuries—such as traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord damage, or injuries resulting in permanent disability—pain and suffering damages can be substantial. In these cases, compensation may range from hundreds of thousands to even millions of dollars, as courts and juries consider the profound, ongoing effects on the individual’s ability to work, live independently, or enjoy life.

Factors Influencing Pain and Suffering Compensation

Several key factors can impact the amount of pain and suffering compensation in Illinois:

Severity of the Injury: Generally, more severe injuries command higher compensation, particularly if the injury results in chronic pain, long-term disability, or significant emotional distress.

Duration of Recovery: The longer the recovery period, the higher the pain and suffering damages are likely to be. This takes into account the extended impact on the victim’s daily life, both physically and emotionally.

Impact on Quality of Life: Injuries that prevent a person from enjoying activities they once loved, working, or performing everyday tasks often justify a higher compensation amount, reflecting the substantial life changes the victim endures.

Emotional and Psychological Impact: In cases where emotional suffering is particularly high—such as with PTSD, anxiety, or depression following the injury—additional compensation may be awarded to account for the emotional toll on the injured party.

Recent Trends in Illinois

Illinois doesn’t impose caps on pain and suffering damages in personal injury cases, allowing courts to fully assess the personal impact of each case when determining compensation. As a result, plaintiffs have the potential to receive fair and comprehensive compensation based on the specifics of their injury. In recent years, Illinois courts have shown a willingness to award substantial pain and suffering damages, particularly for severe and life-changing injuries, in recognition of the profound hardships faced by injured individuals.

In Illinois, every personal injury case is unique, so the exact compensation amount for pain and suffering will always depend on individual circumstances. By understanding the factors and ranges commonly seen in Illinois, victims can better assess their own situations and pursue fair compensation for the pain and suffering they’ve endured.

Get connected to a trusted local attorney.
No upfront fees. Learn more.

Does Insurance Pay For a Pain & Suffering Claim?

While insurance policies typically cover economic damages—like medical bills and lost wages—compensation for pain and suffering is less straightforward. Pain and suffering refer to the non-economic damages associated with physical pain, emotional distress, and diminished quality of life following an injury. Whether or not insurance pays for these damages depends on the specifics of the policy, the type of insurance involved, and the circumstances of the case.

Auto Insurance and Pain & Suffering

In many personal injury cases, such as car accidents, insurance companies do cover pain and suffering, but only under certain conditions. In at-fault states like Illinois, the injured party can seek pain and suffering damages from the at-fault driver’s liability insurance. However, the amount an insurance company is willing to pay for pain and suffering often depends on the severity of the injuries, the policy limits, and the evidence presented to support the claim.

Insurance companies frequently use a formula, such as the Multiplier Method, to determine the value of pain and suffering. The multiplier is usually between 1.5 and 5, depending on the extent of the injury and its impact on the victim’s life. Keep in mind that insurers will often try to minimize the payout, so negotiations with the insurance adjuster are common to reach a fair settlement.

Health Insurance and Pain & Suffering

Health insurance policies generally do not cover pain and suffering, as they are intended to cover medical expenses, medications, and treatment costs directly related to an injury or illness. If a person is pursuing a pain and suffering claim due to a personal injury, that compensation would typically come from a liability claim or a personal injury lawsuit rather than their health insurance policy.

Homeowner’s or Renter’s Insurance and Pain & Suffering

Homeowner’s or renter’s insurance can sometimes cover pain and suffering, but only if the injury occurred on the insured property and liability for the injury can be established. For example, if someone is injured due to unsafe conditions at a property (like a slip and fall), they may file a claim against the homeowner’s insurance, which may include compensation for pain and suffering. However, these claims are usually subject to policy limits and may require negotiation to reach an acceptable settlement amount.

Workers’ Compensation and Pain & Suffering

Pain and suffering are typically not covered under workers’ compensation insurance. In Illinois, as in most states, workers’ compensation is designed to cover medical expenses, rehabilitation, and lost wages due to workplace injuries. Since it’s a no-fault system, workers are generally unable to pursue pain and suffering damages through workers’ compensation. However, if a third party (someone other than the employer) is partially responsible for the injury, the injured employee may have the option to pursue a separate personal injury claim for pain and suffering against that third party.

Tips for Seeking Pain & Suffering Compensation from Insurance

Insurance companies often attempt to limit payouts for pain and suffering. Here are some tips to help maximize your claim:

Document the Injury: Medical records, doctor’s notes, and photographs of the injury can all provide valuable evidence to support a pain and suffering claim.
Gather Testimonies: Statements from medical professionals, family members, or friends can illustrate the personal impact of the injury and support the claim for non-economic damages.
Work with a Legal Professional: Insurance companies often take claims more seriously when an experienced attorney is involved. A personal injury attorney can help negotiate with the insurer and advocate for a fair settlement.

Consulting with a personal injury attorney can provide further guidance on what types of compensation may be available and how to effectively pursue a claim for pain and suffering.

Speak to a lawyer about your case today.

Is Future Pain and Suffering Included in the Payout Calculation?

When injuries are expected to have long-term effects, Illinois law allows plaintiffs to seek damages for the impact these lasting hardships will have on their lives. Calculating future pain and suffering, however, requires a detailed analysis of how the injury will affect the person over time, making it a complex but essential part of the compensation process.

How Future Pain and Suffering is Calculated

To estimate future pain and suffering, attorneys and courts examine several key factors:

Severity and Nature of the Injury: The more severe the injury, the more likely it is to have long-term effects. Injuries like traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord damage, and chronic pain conditions are examples of situations where future suffering is almost certain. Courts take into account how these conditions will affect an individual’s daily life, ability to work, and overall quality of life in the years to come.
Expected Duration of Suffering: Future pain and suffering calculations include an assessment of how long the pain, discomfort, or emotional distress is expected to last. For example, if an injury will likely cause discomfort for a few years, the future pain and suffering will be calculated for that timeframe. For permanent conditions or injuries with no expected full recovery, courts may consider the person’s life expectancy to determine the duration.
Impact on Lifestyle and Abilities: Injuries that limit mobility, prevent someone from engaging in activities they once enjoyed, or reduce independence may result in higher future pain and suffering awards. The court will evaluate the extent to which these limitations impact daily life, personal relationships, and career potential.
Medical and Expert Testimony: Testimony from medical professionals is crucial in assessing future pain and suffering. Doctors and specialists provide insight into the long-term effects of the injury, likely treatments needed, and potential complications. This testimony helps the court understand the trajectory of the injury, allowing for a more accurate estimate of future suffering.

Why Future Pain and Suffering Matters

Future pain and suffering compensation ensures that victims are fairly compensated for the total impact of their injury. This is especially important in cases where the injury may require ongoing medical care, therapy, or adjustments to one’s living environment. By including future pain and suffering in the calculation, the court aims to provide a comprehensive payout that addresses the entire scope of the injury, not just the immediate aftermath.

Challenges in Calculating Future Pain and Suffering

Estimating future pain and suffering can be challenging, as it involves predicting the physical and emotional toll an injury will take over time. Insurance companies often push back against future pain and suffering claims, arguing that they are speculative. For this reason, strong medical evidence and expert testimony are essential in establishing a credible case for future damages. Additionally, working with an experienced attorney can help maximize the likelihood of receiving fair compensation by presenting a well-supported, compelling case.

Not sure if you have a case?
Contact us today.

When Might Pain and Suffering Compensation Not Be Available in Illinois?

While pain and suffering compensation is a key part of many personal injury cases in Illinois, there are specific situations where it may not be available. Understanding these exceptions can help individuals set realistic expectations about the types of damages they may be eligible to pursue. Here are some of the primary scenarios in Illinois where pain and suffering compensation may be limited or unavailable:

1. Workers’ Compensation Cases: In Illinois, workers’ compensation claims typically do not include pain and suffering damages. Workers’ compensation is a no-fault system designed to provide benefits for work-related injuries without requiring the injured employee to prove negligence. As a trade-off, workers’ comp benefits cover medical expenses, rehabilitation, and a portion of lost wages but do not extend to pain and suffering. If the injury was caused by a third party (such as a subcontractor or equipment manufacturer), the injured worker might be able to pursue a separate personal injury claim that could include pain and suffering.
2. Minimal Injury or Temporary Discomfort: If an injury is very minor or results in only temporary discomfort, pain and suffering compensation may be minimal or even denied altogether. For instance, if someone experiences a minor bruise or slight soreness that resolves quickly without medical intervention, it may not be enough to warrant non-economic damages. Insurance companies and courts generally require evidence of significant physical or emotional distress to consider awarding pain and suffering.
3. Cases Involving Purely Economic Losses: Some cases involve only economic damages, such as property damage or financial losses, without any personal injury. For example, in a case where someone’s car is damaged in an accident but they were not physically harmed, pain and suffering compensation would not be applicable. Non-economic damages are only available when a personal injury has led to physical pain, mental anguish, or a similar hardship that affects the individual’s quality of life.
4. Claims Against Government Entities: Suing government entities can come with certain limitations in Illinois. While it’s possible to file claims against government agencies in cases of negligence, state laws impose certain restrictions, including caps on damages. Some government agencies may limit or exclude compensation for pain and suffering, depending on the nature of the claim. It’s essential to consult with an attorney in these cases to understand what types of damages may be available and any specific restrictions that apply.
5. Cases Settled Out of Court Without Pain and Suffering Inclusion: In some instances, an insurance company or defendant may offer a settlement that excludes or undervalues pain and suffering damages. While this doesn’t necessarily mean pain and suffering are unavailable, accepting such a settlement could mean waiving the right to pursue these damages further. It’s crucial to carefully review settlement offers and consult with an attorney before accepting any offer that may limit pain and suffering compensation.
6. Cases Where Contributory Negligence Reduces or Eliminates Damages: In Illinois, a modified comparative negligence rule applies, meaning that if an injured party is found to be 51% or more at fault for their injury, they may not be entitled to any compensation, including pain and suffering. If the injured party is less than 51% at fault, they can still recover damages, but the amount will be reduced by their degree of fault. Therefore, if contributory negligence is significant, it can limit or eliminate the availability of pain and suffering compensation.

For anyone that may be considering filing a claim, understanding these limitations can help to set realistic expectations and ensure that the legal strategy pursued is in line with what’s achievable under Illinois law.

Can Financial Compensation For Pain & Suffering By Capped by Illinois Law?

In some states, laws impose limits or “caps” on these non-economic damages, restricting the amount a person can recover for pain and suffering. However, Illinois currently does not impose such caps on pain and suffering compensation in most personal injury cases, allowing victims to seek full, fair compensation based on the specific impact of their injuries.

History of Pain and Suffering Caps in Illinois

In Illinois, there have been attempts to introduce caps on non-economic damages, particularly in medical malpractice cases. For instance, in 2005, the Illinois legislature passed a law imposing a $500,000 cap on pain and suffering damages against individual physicians and a $1 million cap against hospitals. However, in 2010, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that these caps were unconstitutional, stating that they interfered with the jury’s role in assessing fair compensation based on the facts of each case.

Since that ruling, Illinois has had no statewide limits on pain and suffering compensation in personal injury cases, including medical malpractice, car accidents, and other forms of negligence.

Why Illinois Chooses Not to Cap Pain and Suffering

Illinois places a high value on the right of individuals to recover compensation that reflects the full impact of their injuries. Without caps, courts can assess damages for pain and suffering based on the unique circumstances of each case, considering factors like the severity of the injury, duration of recovery, and emotional impact. This approach recognizes that injuries affect people differently and that arbitrary limits may fail to account for the true extent of a person’s suffering.

For instance, a person who suffers a severe spinal cord injury resulting in paralysis will likely endure a lifetime of physical pain, emotional distress, and lifestyle limitations. In these cases, unrestricted compensation allows juries to award damages that truly reflect the enduring nature of the hardship faced by the victim.

Exceptions and Limitations

While Illinois does not cap pain and suffering in typical personal injury cases, there are situations where practical or legal limitations may affect the final compensation amount:

Insurance Policy Limits: In some cases, an individual’s recovery may be limited by the at-fault party’s insurance policy limits. Even without a legal cap, if the defendant’s insurance coverage is exhausted, the plaintiff may not be able to collect the full amount awarded unless other assets are available.

Government Claims: Suing a government entity in Illinois can involve certain restrictions, including limits on damages. While specific caps vary by government agency and claim type, pain and suffering awards may be limited when a government body is involved.

Comparative Fault: Illinois follows a modified comparative negligence rule, which means that if a plaintiff is found to be partially at fault for their injuries, their compensation, including pain and suffering, may be reduced. If the injured party is more than 50% responsible, they may be barred from recovering any damages.

How Pain and Suffering Damages Are Determined Without Caps

Since Illinois doesn’t impose caps, courts and juries have flexibility in determining appropriate pain and suffering compensation. Factors considered include the physical pain endured, the emotional and psychological toll, any loss of enjoyment of life, and the lasting impact of the injury on daily activities. This case-by-case approach allows for individualized assessments that reflect the genuine hardship experienced by the injured party.

Who Can Help Me With a Lawsuit?

If you’ve been injured and are considering a lawsuit, you may be wondering who can guide you through the legal process. Navigating a lawsuit can be complex and, at times, overwhelming. Fortunately, there are professionals and resources available to help you build a strong case, understand your rights, and pursue fair compensation. A skilled accident lawyer in Chicago can help you understand your rights, gather evidence, negotiate with insurance companies, and represent you in court if needed. They are your primary advocate, working to secure compensation for medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages.

Injury Law Support is here to help you find the resources and legal representation you need, so you can focus on your recovery and move forward.

Free Case Review

No Upfront Fees. No Obligation.

"*" indicates required fields