Can You Re-Open A Car Accident Lawsuit in Iowa?

Navigating the path forward after a car accident can be difficult, especially if you’ve already settled your case and the settlement amount is less than what you had hoped for. However, circumstances may change or new evidence may emerge after the case has closed which leads to the topic of reopening a closed lawsuit. In Iowa, reopening a car accident lawsuit is possible under certain conditions. In this article, we will investigate the process and factors involved in having a case reconsidered.

Table of Contents

• What Causes a Car Accident Lawsuit To Be Closed?
• What Happens When a Case is Closed?
• What Are The Most Common Reasons To Reopen A Closed Case?
• What Is a “Release” And What Does It Mean In a Lawsuit?
• If New Evidence Appears After a Case Is Closed, Can it Be Reopened?
• What If There Were Errors in the Paperwork That Was Filed With The Case?
• What If I Signed The Insurance Agreement Without Talking To a Lawyer?
• If A Defendant Lied During A Lawsuit But It Was Discovered After The Case Was Closed, Can The Case Be Reopened?
• What If I Have Additional Medical Costs After My Case Is Closed?
• What Happens if My Lawyer Undervalued My Lawsuit?
• Who Can Help Me Reopen An Auto Accident Lawsuit?

What Causes a Car Accident Lawsuit To Be Closed?

The closure of a car accident lawsuit signifies the conclusion of the legal process regarding the specific claims raised in the lawsuit. Most commonly, this occurs when a settlement is reached between parties that agree on terms that resolve the dispute. A lawsuit may also be closed if a court judgment is rendered or, if the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the case, either due to reaching a private settlement with the defendant, deciding not to pursue the claim further, or other strategic considerations.

Settlement Agreement

• Mutual Agreement: The most common reason for a car accident lawsuit to be closed is a settlement agreement between the parties involved. Both parties agree on a compensation amount, and the plaintiff typically signs a release of liability, waiving any further claims related to the accident.
• Court Approval: In some cases, especially where minors are involved, the court must approve the settlement agreement to ensure it is in the best interest of the parties.

Court Judgment

• Verdict: If the case goes to trial, it concludes with a court judgment based on the jury’s verdict or the judge’s decision. The judgment determines the amount of compensation, if any, that the defendant must pay the plaintiff.
• Dismissal: A judge may dismiss the case for various reasons, such as lack of evidence, procedural errors, or failure to comply with court orders.

Voluntary Dismissal

• Plaintiff’s Decision: The plaintiff may choose to voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit, often due to receiving a satisfactory settlement offer outside of court or deciding that pursuing the case is not worth the time, expense, or emotional toll.

Statute of Limitations

• Time Limit Expiration: Car accident lawsuits must be filed within a specific time frame known as the statute of limitations. In Iowa, the statute of limitations for personal injury cases, including car accidents, is generally two years from the date of the accident. If this period expires, the court will close the case, and the plaintiff loses the right to sue.

Arbitration or Mediation

• Alternative Dispute Resolution: Parties may agree to resolve their dispute through arbitration or mediation instead of going to trial. A successful resolution through these methods results in the closure of the lawsuit.

Failure to Prosecute

• Inaction by Plaintiff: If the plaintiff fails to actively pursue the case, such as not attending hearings or not complying with court procedures, the court may close the case for failure to prosecute.

Bankruptcy of Defendant

• Bankruptcy Proceedings: If the defendant files for bankruptcy, the lawsuit may be closed or stayed, as bankruptcy proceedings can halt ongoing litigation and potentially discharge certain debts, including judgments from personal injury claims.

Death of a Party

• Legal Complications: The death of either the plaintiff or defendant can complicate the lawsuit. While the case can continue through the estate of the deceased, it may also lead to the closure of the case if the legal issues become too complex or the parties decide not to pursue further action.

Each of these factors plays a critical role in the lifecycle of a car accident lawsuit, influencing when and how a case might be closed. Understanding these causes helps parties involved in such lawsuits to better navigate the legal landscape and make informed decisions throughout the process.

Have some questions?
We can help you find answers.

Back To Top

What Happens When a Car Accident Case is Closed?

When a case is closed, several events usually take place:

• Final Resolution (Judgment or Settlement): The legal dispute is officially concluded, whether through a settlement agreement, a court judgment, or the plaintiff voluntarily dismissing the case.
• Disbursement of Funds: If the case resulted in a monetary award, settlement funds or damages awarded by the court are distributed to the parties involved, including attorneys’ fees and any outstanding expenses.
• Release of Liability: The plaintiff typically signs a release of liability, which is a legal document stating that they will not file any more claims or lawsuits related to the same accident. This document is crucial for the defendant as it protects them from future litigation concerning the incident.
• Legal Records / Administrative Wrap-Up: The case file is closed and archived by the court, ensuring that all relevant documents and evidence are securely stored for future reference if needed.
  • Paperwork Completion: Both parties’ legal teams complete any remaining administrative tasks, such as filing the final settlement documents, updating client records, and closing their internal case files.
  • Record Keeping: Attorneys maintain records of the case for future reference, in compliance with legal and professional standards for record retention.
• Credit and Liens Resolution:
  •  Lien Satisfaction: If there were any medical or legal liens against the settlement (for example, if healthcare providers had liens on the settlement for unpaid medical bills), these are resolved and paid out from the settlement funds.
  • Credit Reporting: Any related debts or financial obligations are updated accordingly in credit reports, ensuring that the financial aspects of the case are settled.
• Closure for Parties: With the signing of the release of liability and the case dismissal, no further legal actions can be taken by the plaintiff against the defendant for the same accident. This ensures that the case is completely closed and final. Both plaintiff and defendant can move forward knowing that the matter has been resolved, providing closure to the legal proceedings and allowing them to focus on other matters.
  • Final Communication: The attorneys inform their clients about the closure of the case, providing them with copies of all relevant documents, such as the release of liability, the final settlement agreement, and any court orders.
  • Follow-Up: Legal representatives may follow up with clients to ensure they understand the implications of the case closure and address any remaining questions or concerns.
• Appeals Process: Depending on the circumstances, parties may have the option to appeal the court’s decision within a specified timeframe, which could lead to further litigation and a potential reopening of the case.

The closure of a case marks the end of the formal legal process, bringing resolution to the issues raised in the lawsuit.

Need some legal help? Contact us today.

Back To Top

What Are The Most Common Reasons To Reopen A Closed Auto Accident Case?

Some common reasons to reopen a closed case include:

• Newly Discovered Evidence: If significant evidence emerges that was not available during the original proceedings and could impact the outcome of the case, a party may seek to reopen the case to introduce this evidence.
• Legal Error: If there was a mistake of law or procedure during the original trial or hearing, such as an error in jury instructions or a misinterpretation of the law, it could provide grounds for reopening the case.
• Fraud or Misconduct/Misrepresentation: If it’s discovered that one of the parties engaged in fraud, perjury, or other misconduct that affected the outcome of the case, a court may consider reopening the case to rectify the injustice.
• New Legal Precedent: Sometimes, a significant change in legal precedent occurs after a case is closed, which could impact the ruling. In such instances, parties may seek to reopen the case to apply the new legal standard.
• Judgment Vacated: If the judgment was obtained through default or without proper notice to the opposing party, the court may vacate the judgment, allowing the case to be reopened for further proceedings.
• Mistake or Oversight: In some cases, a case may be closed due to a clerical error, oversight, or misunderstanding of the facts. If such errors come to light, the court may reopen the case to address the issue.
• Settlement Agreement Issues:
  • Invalid Settlements: If the settlement agreement was reached under duress, coercion, or without proper understanding by one of the parties, it might be invalid. This can include situations where a party was pressured into accepting the settlement or did not have adequate legal advice at the time.
  • Legal Recourse: Parties can seek to reopen cases to challenge and nullify unfair or improperly negotiated settlements.

Reopening a closed case is a significant legal endeavor and typically requires demonstrating a compelling reason why the case should be reconsidered.

Back To Top

What Is a “Release” And What Does It Mean In a Lawsuit?

A “release” in the context of a lawsuit is a legally binding agreement in which one party agrees to relinquish the right to pursue any further legal action or claims against another party. This agreement is often used to settle disputes, particularly in personal injury cases, such as car accidents. Here’s a detailed look at what a release entails and its implications:

• Definition: A release is a legal document signed by parties involved in a lawsuit, usually the plaintiff (the person bringing the lawsuit) and the defendant (the person being sued).
• Purpose: It serves as a contract between the parties, where the plaintiff agrees to release the defendant from any further liability or legal claims related to the incident or injury that is the subject of the lawsuit.
• Components of a Release:
  • Identification of Parties: The release document clearly identifies the parties involved in the agreement, including the releasor and the releasee.
  • Description of Claims: It specifies the claims or potential claims that are being released. This includes any known and unknown claims that might arise from the incident.
  • Consideration: This refers to the compensation or benefit provided to the releasor in exchange for signing the release. This is typically a monetary payment.
  • Scope of the Release: The document outlines the extent of the claims being waived. It can be a general release (covering all claims related to the incident) or a specific release (covering only certain claims).
  • Legal Language: The release includes legal terms and conditions, ensuring that the document is comprehensive and enforceable in court.
• Scope: The release typically specifies the terms under which the plaintiff agrees to dismiss the lawsuit and forego any further legal action against the defendant.
• Consideration: In exchange for signing the release, the plaintiff often receives some form of compensation, such as a monetary settlement or other benefits negotiated between the parties.
• Finality: Once a release is signed and executed, it usually represents a final resolution of the legal dispute, preventing the plaintiff from seeking additional damages or pursuing further legal action against the defendant for the same matter.
• Legal Effect: Releases are legally binding documents, and once signed, they can be difficult to challenge or invalidate, except in cases of fraud, duress, or other legal grounds for rescission.

A release is a crucial component of settling a lawsuit, as it formalizes the agreement between parties and brings closure to the legal matter at hand.

What Are The Implications of Signing a Release?

• Waiver of Rights: By signing a release, the releasor waives their right to pursue any further legal action related to the specified incident. This means they cannot file another lawsuit or seek additional compensation for the same incident.
• Finality: A release brings finality to the legal dispute. Once signed, the matter is considered resolved, and the case is closed.
• Binding Agreement: A release is a binding contract. Both parties are legally obligated to adhere to its terms. If either party fails to comply, they could face legal consequences.

What Are Some Common Uses of Releases?

• Personal Injury Cases: Releases are frequently used in personal injury settlements, such as car accidents, where the injured party agrees to accept a settlement payment in exchange for not pursuing further legal claims.
• Employment Disputes: In employment-related disputes, such as wrongful termination claims, a release may be used to settle the matter out of court.
• Property Damage: In cases involving property damage, a release can be used to settle the dispute without further litigation.

What Are Some Things I Should Consider Before Signing a Release?

• Legal Advice: It is crucial for individuals to seek legal advice before signing a release. An attorney can review the document to ensure that their rights are adequately protected and that they fully understand the implications of the agreement.
• Fair Compensation: Individuals should ensure that the compensation offered in exchange for signing the release is fair and sufficient to cover their damages and future needs.
• Understanding Terms: The releasor must carefully read and understand all terms and conditions outlined in the release to avoid any unintended consequences.

In summary, a release is a critical document in the legal landscape, serving as a tool to settle disputes and bring finality to legal claims. It is very important for individuals to thoroughly understand the terms and seek legal counsel before agreeing to a release to ensure that their rights and interests are protected.

Not sure if you have a case? Contact us today.

Back To Top

If New Evidence Appears After a Case Is Closed, Can it Be Reopened?

Yes. In Iowa, reopening a closed case due to new evidence is possible but involves a stringent legal process. Some components to consider before proceeding include:

Legal Grounds for Reopening a Case

• Newly Discovered Evidence: The primary ground for reopening a case is the discovery of new evidence that was not available during the original trial. This evidence must be significant enough that it could have affected the outcome of the case if it had been presented initially.

Criteria for New Evidence

• Material Evidence: The new evidence must be material, meaning it directly relates to the case and is significant enough to potentially alter the original verdict or judgment.
• Non-Cumulative: The evidence should not be merely cumulative or repetitive of what was already presented.
• Previously Unavailable: The evidence must have been unavailable at the time of the original trial despite the party’s due diligence in trying to discover it.

Legal Procedure

• Motion for a New Trial: To reopen a case, the affected party must file a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. This motion must clearly outline why the evidence is material, how it was discovered, and why it was not presented during the original trial.
• Timing: The motion must be filed within a specific timeframe after the discovery of the new evidence. In Iowa, this typically means within a reasonable time, and the exact deadline can vary based on the specifics of the case and the type of court involved.

Judicial Discretion

• Court’s Evaluation: The court will evaluate the motion to determine if the new evidence meets the required criteria. Judges have considerable discretion in these decisions and will consider whether reopening the case is in the interest of justice.
• Balancing Fairness and Finality: While courts aim to ensure fairness and justice, they also prioritize the finality of judgments. Therefore, the bar for reopening a case is set high to prevent frequent reopening of cases which could undermine the legal system’s efficiency.

Impact of Reopened Cases

• Potential Outcomes: If a case is reopened, it can lead to various outcomes. The court might order a new trial, modify the original judgment, or even reverse the decision based on the new evidence.
• Implications for the Parties: Reopening a case can have significant implications for both parties, including additional legal costs, extended litigation, and potential changes in the legal responsibilities or rights of the parties involved.

What Are Some Example Cases and Precedents?

• Case Law: In Iowa, courts have dealt with various cases where motions for a new trial were based on newly discovered evidence. Reviewing specific case law can provide insights into how courts typically handle such motions. An example is State v. Jefferson, where the Iowa Supreme Court discussed the standards for granting a new trial based on new evidence.

Reopening a closed case in Iowa due to new evidence is a complex and challenging process. It requires demonstrating that the new evidence is material, non-cumulative, and was previously unavailable despite diligent efforts. The court’s decision will balance the need for justice with the legal principle of finality, ensuring that only significant and impactful new evidence can justify reopening a case. If you believe you have grounds to reopen a case, consulting with a legal professional who can guide you through the specific requirements and procedural steps is crucial.

Get connected to a trusted local attorney.
No upfront fees. Learn more.

Back To Top

What If There Were Errors in the Paperwork That Was Filed With The Case and The Case is Now Closed?

Errors in the paperwork filed with a lawsuit can have significant implications for the legal proceedings. Following is a list of what happens when such errors are discovered and how they are usually addressed:

Types of Errors

• Clerical Errors: These are minor mistakes, such as typographical errors, incorrect dates, or misspelled names.
• Substantive Errors: These involve more significant mistakes, such as incorrect information about the facts of the case, misstatements of the law, or filing the wrong documents.

Impact of Errors

• Procedural Delays: Errors in paperwork can cause delays in the legal process. For instance, incorrect information might require the resubmission of documents or additional hearings to correct the mistakes.
• Case Dismissal: In some instances, significant errors can lead to the dismissal of a case. This might occur if the errors are found to undermine the legal foundation of the claims or defenses presented.

Correcting Clerical Errors

• Motion to Amend: Parties can file a motion to amend the documents to correct clerical errors. Courts generally allow these corrections to ensure that minor mistakes do not affect the substantive rights of the parties involved.
• Court’s Initiative: Sometimes, the court may identify clerical errors and correct them on its own initiative, especially if they are apparent and undisputed.

Addressing Substantive Errors

• Amended Filings: For more significant errors, parties may need to file amended pleadings. This process involves formally resubmitting corrected documents to replace the erroneous ones.
• Permission from the Court: In many jurisdictions, including Iowa, the court’s permission is required to amend substantive errors after certain deadlines have passed. This typically involves demonstrating that the correction is necessary for justice to be served and that the other party will not be unduly prejudiced.

Legal Remedies and Recourse

• Reopening the Case: If significant errors are discovered after a case is closed, a party might seek to reopen the case. This requires filing a motion and demonstrating that the errors materially affected the outcome of the case.
• Appeals: Errors in paperwork can also be grounds for an appeal if they resulted in an unjust decision. The appellate court will review the case to determine if the errors warrant a reversal or modification of the decision.

Judicial Review

• Error Evaluation: Judges typically evaluate the impact of the errors on the case. If the errors are deemed harmless and did not affect the case’s outcome, the court may decide not to take any action. Conversely, if the errors are material, the court may order appropriate remedies.
• Prejudice to Parties: The court considers whether the errors caused any prejudice to the involved parties. Significant errors that affect the fairness of the proceedings are more likely to lead to corrective actions.

Some Examples and Case Law

• Case Precedents: Reviewing case law can provide insights into how courts handle errors in legal documents. For example, in Johnson v. Johnson, an Iowa court allowed an amendment to correct a substantive error that was discovered after the initial filing, emphasizing the importance of fairness and accuracy in legal proceedings.
• Legal Standards: Courts adhere to specific legal standards and procedural rules when addressing errors. These standards ensure that corrections are made in a manner that upholds the integrity of the judicial process.

While clerical errors are generally easier to correct through motions to amend or judicial initiative, substantive errors, however, may require more formal procedures, including the filing of amended documents or seeking the court’s permission for corrections. Understanding these processes helps ensure that mistakes are addressed promptly and fairly, preserving the rights and interests of all parties involved. Legal advice should be sought to navigate the complexities of correcting errors in legal filings effectively.

Speak to a lawyer about your case today.

Back To Top

What If I Signed The Insurance Agreement Without Talking To a Lawyer?

Signing an insurance agreement without consulting a lawyer can have significant implications. Let’s what this means and the potential consequences:

Binding Agreement

• Legally Binding: When you sign an insurance agreement, it becomes a legally binding contract. This means you are agreeing to all the terms and conditions outlined in the agreement, and it is difficult to alter or dispute these terms after signing.
• Waiver of Rights: Often, these agreements include clauses that waive your right to pursue further legal action or additional compensation related to the incident.

Potential Consequences

• Inadequate Compensation: Insurance companies aim to minimize payouts. Without legal advice, you may accept a settlement that is significantly lower than what you are entitled to. Lawyers can assess the full extent of your damages, including medical bills, lost wages, and future expenses, ensuring you receive fair compensation.
• Understanding Legal Terms: Insurance agreements often contain complex legal jargon. Without a lawyer’s guidance, you might misunderstand or overlook critical terms that could affect your rights and compensation.

Limited Recourse

• Challenging the Agreement: Once signed, challenging an insurance agreement is challenging. Courts generally uphold signed contracts unless there is clear evidence of fraud, misrepresentation, or coercion. Proving these elements requires substantial evidence and legal expertise.
• Legal Costs: Attempting to dispute a signed agreement can be costly and time-consuming. It involves legal fees and prolonged litigation, which might not guarantee a favorable outcome.

Steps to Take After Signing

• Consult a Lawyer Immediately: If you realize you’ve signed an agreement without legal advice, consult a lawyer immediately. They can review the agreement and assess if there are any grounds to challenge it.
• Document Everything: Keep detailed records of all communications with the insurance company, including emails, letters, and phone calls. This documentation can be crucial if you need to dispute the agreement later.

Preventive Measures

• Seek Legal Advice First: Always consult a lawyer before signing any insurance agreement. Lawyers specializing in personal injury or insurance claims can provide invaluable advice and negotiate on your behalf to ensure a fair settlement.
• Understand Your Rights: Educate yourself about your rights and the typical processes involved in insurance claims. Understanding the basics can help you avoid common pitfalls and make informed decisions.

Case Studies and Legal Precedents

• Case Law: Reviewing similar cases can provide insights into potential outcomes. For example, in cases where agreements were disputed successfully, common factors included clear evidence of misrepresentation or lack of informed consent at the time of signing.
• Legal Advice Importance: Legal experts consistently emphasize the importance of consulting a lawyer before signing any legal documents related to insurance claims. Lawyers ensure that you understand all implications and help protect your interests.

Signing an insurance agreement without consulting a lawyer can lead to inadequate compensation and limited recourse for disputes. It is crucial to seek legal advice before signing any agreement to fully understand your rights and ensure fair treatment. If you have already signed, immediate legal consultation is essential to explore any possible corrective actions.

Get connected to a trusted local attorney.
No upfront fees. Learn more.

Back To Top

If A Defendant Lied During A Lawsuit But It Was Discovered After The Case Was Closed, Can The Case Be Reopened?

In Iowa, as in many jurisdictions, discovering that a defendant lied during a lawsuit can be grounds for reopening a closed case. Here’s a detailed look at the process and considerations involved:

What Are Some Grounds for Reopening a Case?

• Fraud on the Court: If it is discovered that the defendant committed fraud by lying during the lawsuit, this can be considered “fraud on the court.” Fraud on the court involves deliberate deception that affects the integrity of the judicial process.
• Newly Discovered Evidence: The discovery of false testimony or fraudulent conduct can constitute newly discovered evidence, which is a common ground for reopening a case.

What is The Legal Process to Re-Open a Closed Case?

• Filing a Motion: To reopen a case based on newly discovered evidence or fraud, the aggrieved party must file a motion with the court. This motion must clearly outline the fraudulent behavior and provide evidence to support the claims.
• Time Limits: There are typically time limits within which a motion to reopen a case must be filed. In many cases, this is within one year of the discovery of the fraud. However, the exact timeframe can vary, so it’s important to act promptly.

What are Some Criteria for Reopening a Closed Case?

• Materiality: The fraudulent behavior or false testimony must be material to the case. This means that the lie must have had a significant impact on the outcome of the case.
• Due Diligence: The party seeking to reopen the case must demonstrate that they exercised due diligence in discovering the fraud. They need to show that the evidence of the fraud could not have been discovered earlier with reasonable efforts.

What Does The Court Evaluate?

• Burden of Proof: The burden of proof lies with the party seeking to reopen the case. They must provide clear and convincing evidence that fraud occurred and that it affected the judgment.
• Judicial Discretion: The court has broad discretion in deciding whether to reopen a case. The judge will consider whether reopening the case is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice.

What Are Some Potential Outcomes if a Lie is Confirmed?

• New Trial: If the court finds sufficient evidence of fraud, it may order a new trial. This allows the case to be heard again, with the fraudulent evidence excluded or corrected.
• Amendment of Judgment: In some cases, the court may amend the original judgment based on the new evidence, without a full retrial.

What Are Some Case Studies and Precedents?

• Case Law: Various case precedents highlight how courts handle instances of fraud discovered after a case is closed. For instance, in the landmark case of Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., the U.S. Supreme Court held that fraud on the court justifies reopening a case even after the judgment has become final.
• Iowa Precedents: Reviewing Iowa-specific cases can provide further insight into how local courts interpret and apply these principles. Iowa courts adhere to similar standards of materiality and due diligence as federal courts.

The legal process involves filing a motion and proving that the lie had a significant impact on the case’s outcome. Courts exercise discretion in these matters to ensure that justice is served and that the integrity of the judicial process is maintained. If you find yourself in this situation, consulting with a legal professional is crucial to navigate the complexities and ensure the appropriate steps are taken.

Not sure if you have a case?
Contact us today.

Back To Top

What If I Have Additional Medical Costs After My Case Is Closed?

If you incur additional medical costs after your case is closed, you may still have options to address them. Some of these options include:

• Review the Settlement Agreement: Start by reviewing the terms of your settlement agreement. Some agreements include provisions for future medical expenses related to the accident. If your settlement includes such provisions, you may be entitled to reimbursement for additional medical costs.
• Seek Legal Advice: Consult with an experienced attorney to understand your rights and options. They can review your case and the terms of your settlement to determine if you have grounds to seek compensation for additional medical expenses.
• Reopen the Case: In some situations, it may be possible to reopen your case if there are compelling reasons, such as newly discovered evidence or errors in the original proceedings. An attorney can help you assess whether reopening the case is feasible and advisable in your situation.
• Explore Other Insurance Coverage: Depending on the nature of your injuries and your insurance coverage, you may have other avenues to pursue compensation for additional medical costs. For example, if you have health insurance or disability insurance, they may cover some of the expenses.
• Negotiate with the Insurance Company: If reopening the case is not an option, you can try negotiating with the insurance company directly. Provide them with documentation of your additional medical expenses and make a compelling case for why they should cover these costs.
• State-Specific Laws (Iowa): Under Iowa law, the finality of settlements is generally respected to maintain the efficiency and reliability of legal resolutions. However, specific legal advice from an Iowa attorney can provide guidance based on the nuances of state law and your particular circumstances .
• File a Lawsuit: As a last resort, if you cannot reach a satisfactory resolution with the insurance company, you may consider filing a lawsuit to seek compensation for the additional medical expenses. An attorney can guide you through the litigation process and advocate for your rights.

It is very important to act promptly and seek legal advice to ensure that your rights are protected and that you have the best possible chance of obtaining compensation for your additional medical costs.

Get connected to a trusted local attorney.
No upfront fees. Learn more.

Back To Top

What Happens if My Lawyer Undervalued My Lawsuit and The Case Is Closed?

If you believe your lawyer undervalued your lawsuit, it can have significant consequences on the compensation you receive and your satisfaction with the legal process. Learn more about what you can do about it:

Recognizing the Undervaluation:

• Settlement Amount: You may realize that your lawsuit was undervalued if the settlement amount is significantly lower than what you believe you deserve based on your injuries, damages, and other losses.
• Comparison with Similar Cases: Comparing your settlement to similar cases can also indicate undervaluation. If others with similar injuries and circumstances received higher settlements, it might suggest your case was undervalued.

Impact on Your Compensation:

• Insufficient Coverage: An undervalued lawsuit means you might not receive enough compensation to cover your medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages.
• Financial Strain: Insufficient settlement funds can lead to financial strain, especially if ongoing medical treatment or other long-term costs are involved.

Legal Recourse:

• Negligence or Malpractice: If the undervaluation is due to your lawyer’s negligence or incompetence, you might have grounds for a legal malpractice claim. Legal malpractice occurs when a lawyer fails to provide competent and professional services, resulting in harm to the client.
• Proving Malpractice: To prove legal malpractice, you must demonstrate that your lawyer’s actions fell below the standard of care, and this directly caused you to receive a lower settlement. This typically requires showing that a competent lawyer would have achieved a better outcome.

Steps to Take:

• Consult a New Attorney: If you suspect your case was undervalued, consult with another attorney who specializes in legal malpractice or personal injury. They can review your case and advise whether you have grounds for a malpractice claim.
• Review Settlement Documents: Carefully review all settlement documents and communication with your former lawyer. Look for any signs of negligence, lack of diligence, or failure to pursue all available damages.
• Gather Evidence: Collect evidence supporting your claim that the lawsuit was undervalued. This includes medical records, expert testimonies, and comparisons with similar cases.

Filing a Malpractice Claim:

• Complaint to State Bar: You can file a complaint with your state’s bar association if you believe your lawyer acted unethically or incompetently. The bar association can investigate the matter and take disciplinary action if necessary.
• Lawsuit for Damages: If you have a strong case, you can file a lawsuit against your former lawyer for legal malpractice. Successful claims can result in compensation for the difference between what you received and what you should have received.

Preventive Measures

• Choose Experienced Lawyers: To avoid undervaluation, select a lawyer with experience and a proven track record in handling similar cases. Research their reputation and past case outcomes.
• Stay Informed and Involved: Maintain regular communication with your lawyer and stay informed about your case’s progress. Ask questions and ensure you understand the valuation of your claim.

Recognizing the undervaluation and taking appropriate legal steps can help address the issue. Consulting with a new attorney and potentially pursuing a legal malpractice claim are critical actions to ensure you receive the compensation you deserve.

Need help reviewing a claim? Contact us today.

Back To Top

Who Can Help Me Reopen An Auto Accident Lawsuit?

If you’re seeking assistance to reopen an auto accident lawsuit, there are several avenues you can explore.

Injury Law Support provides a free, no-obligation service to connect with local lawyers via our “Free Case Review” form. There is no upfront fee, the initial call with a lawyer is free and there is no obligation to pursue a legal solution if it’s determined you have an opportunity to reopen a closed case.

Reopening an auto accident lawsuit requires legal expertise and compelling justification. Injury Law Support provides a valuable resource by connecting you with vetted, licensed lawyers in Iowa who can help you navigate the legal system and seek justice.

Injury Law Support
Your pathway to experienced accident lawyers.

Back To Top